PC Plod the arrogant tw*t

I pointed out the shortcomings of West Yorkshire's Spineless on the T&A website and was rewarded with this response which probably comes from some idiot pretending to be a plod but really illustrates the sort of twats who are recruited by the police:

Posted by: Anon, Bfd on 3:38pm Fri 4 May 07
Baht at...................Looking at your blog you seem to be a millitant. However, can I ask who out of the photographs of people on your web site gave their permission to have pictures or indeed pictures of their vehicles with clear registrations identified? Sorry this is an infringement on their Human Rights, Article * - The right to a private life. I suggest that you are infringing on these persons rights and will have to remove them forthwith. The same goes for your accusations of the male allegedly having sex with prostitutes and leaving condoms at the scene. This is against article 6 - The right to a fair trial. Sorry you cannot set yourself up as judge and jury. Proof seems to b e a miss where you are concerned and I think youonly listen to other peoples tales rather than experiencing them personally. As you know I an officer of the law, if they are not removed I may have to deal with the matter personally. Thank you
Baht at...................Looking at your blog you seem to be a millitant.

However, can I ask who out of the photographs of people on your web site gave their permission to have pictures or indeed pictures of their vehicles with clear registrations identified? Sorry this is an infringement on their Human Rights, Article * - The right to a private life. I suggest that you are infringing on these persons rights and will have to remove them forthwith. The same goes for your accusations of the male allegedly having sex with prostitutes and leaving condoms at the scene. This is against article 6 - The right to a fair trial.

Sorry you cannot set yourself up as judge and jury.

Proof seems to b e a miss where you are concerned and I think youonly listen to other peoples tales rather than experiencing them personally.

As you know I an officer of the law, if they are not removed I may have to deal with the matter personally.

I.E a nitpicking arsehole with more concern for people's rights than the fact they have parked their car on the pavement. Listen fuckwit the convention on human rights sets out what the state can do to infringe the rights of individuals and what it should do to protect them - it says fuck all about what individuals can do in the absence of specific laws passed by the government. In the extremely unlikely event there was a case the claim would be against the state for not having effective laws to stop me breaching privacy not against me.

As to "proof seems amiss" well the cars are parked on the fucking pavement as I said or are you blind and the blonde WPC was pushing the suspects head in and out of the hedge because I was there and saw it. Mind you I expect that as usual her fellow officer would lie to protect the bad apple as they always do. Stange how when the public have evidence the police ignore it and when they claim to have evidence it is usually hearsay or fabricated.

Comments

Hiya check this pdf out i

Hiya check this pdf out
i found it very handy when the local plod didn't like that he walked in to a photograph i was taking

http://www.sirimo.co.uk/ukpr.php Uk phographers rights in UK law
and a couple of extracts from it
"taking photograhs of a person in a public place would not normally be regarded as invasion of privacy"
"the lack of UK law means that photographers are not only free to take photograhs of people in public places but they can do what they wish with those photos"

Regards Dick

thanks I assumed that was

thanks I assumed that was the situation, and was even more convinced when an internet-using maybe cop said it wasn't. You can always rely on the police cannon fodder ranks to know sweet FA about the law and be surprised when you kick them in the balls in legitimate self defence.

No prob at all glad to be of

No prob at all glad to be of service

the only way somebody can biach at you for your photography is if your stood on their land while you take a photo of them been a shite driver in town :-/

:oP

oops fogot to say . in regards to the condoms thingie
he plod talks about human rights so he is limiting your right to your view and freedom of speech
etc etc so really that could be classed as a threat

Yes I'm toying with bring

Yes I'm toying with bring the thread on the T&A to the attention of the Chief Constable - or I would if I didn't think co-operating with the police in anyway was a crime against humanity in the current police state. Better to let the bad apples fester and bring the whole thing tumbling down than help them weed them out.

I can't see the problem

I can't see the problem as they prob allready have the same shot's you have taken on CCTV from 20 diffrent cam's

it's amazing that the plod can bother people for taking photos (when as we now know its legal) but people driving with mobiles, Smoking weed , parking on pavments and been Chav's are free to do as they please

Last week I was in town and the plod was walking in front of me , two yob's walked post with a joint ( you could smell it before they got round the corner) and the plod didn't even take a look / never mind a 2nd look